Shell consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety guide has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the atmosphere.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others in the oil and gasoline business to “stroll away while there’s still time”.

The executive, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had quit because of Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not placing environmental security earlier than production”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s stated safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they're completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes excessive harms, to our climate, to the environment and to individuals. And no matter they are saying, Shell is just not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett advised the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline manufacturing. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “Because, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around internet zero, they aren't winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to explore and extract far more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was impressed to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Riot climate protesters urging the corporate’s employees to depart. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and fuel employees to stroll away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs inside security surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to walk away and “many people working in fossil gas corporations simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really consider their imaginative and prescient for more oil and gasoline extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean energy sector left amid studies they have been annoyed on the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions will likely be mentioned at the assembly where the Dutch activist group Follow This may push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in keeping with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed buyers to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set extra stringent climate goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has stated it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief executive, Ben van Beurden, could expertise an investor rise up towards his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote against it.

Sign up to the every day Enterprise At this time email or observe Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we are decided to ship on our international technique to be a internet zero company by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working hard to realize this. We have set targets for the brief, medium and long term, and have each intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, though the world will nonetheless need oil and gas for many years to come back in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the power industry reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition parties to name on the federal government to usher in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the industry approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Energy’s chief government, Linda Prepare dinner, instructed the Financial Instances: “A better tax burden will make it tougher for new oil and gas projects to meet funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer projects can be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when trade is being inspired to extend home UK oil and gasoline production and help an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has advised the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had received a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the firm.