Shell advisor quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety advisor has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gasoline producer in a bombshell public video of inflicting “excessive harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others in the oil and gas trade to “walk away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The chief, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas firm of “operating beyond the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental safety before manufacturing”.

She said: “Shell’s said security ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they're fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our surroundings and to folks. And whatever they say, Shell is just not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to take care of the implications.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries including oil and fuel production. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can now not work for a corporation that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “As a result of, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to discover and extract much more.”

Dennett – a prison justice graduate who has spent her profession in analysis and consultancy – was impressed to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Insurrection local weather protesters urging the company’s employees to go away. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and fuel workers to stroll away from the industry.

The consultant, who runs internal safety surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil fuel firms just aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really consider their vision for more oil and gasoline extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear vitality sector left amid reports they were frustrated at the pace of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions might be mentioned at the meeting where the Dutch activist group Follow This may push for the corporate’s policies to be extra consistent with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed investors to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set extra stringent climate targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s local weather transition proposals.

The Shell chief executive, Ben van Beurden, may expertise an investor rebel against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Signal up to the each day Enterprise Immediately electronic mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in no doubt, we are determined to deliver on our international technique to be a net zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working onerous to attain this. Now we have set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will still want oil and fuel for many years to return in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the energy trade reported bumper earnings fuelled by the increase in market costs, prompting opposition parties to name on the government to usher in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and gasoline producer in the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it will lead to the trade approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Power’s chief govt, Linda Cook, instructed the Financial Times: “The next tax burden will make it tougher for brand new oil and gasoline tasks to meet investment hurdle charges, which means fewer projects might be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when industry is being inspired to extend home UK oil and gasoline production and help an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has advised the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had received a £4.6m “golden whats up” from the agency.